https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Index en-au 5 https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:17793 Sat 24 Mar 2018 07:57:37 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:17209 Sat 24 Mar 2018 07:53:11 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:28293 to, dont for don’t, ☺) will intrude into their formal written work. Eighty-six Australian and 150 Canadian undergraduates were asked to rate the appropriateness of textism use in various situations. Students distinguished between the appropriateness of using textisms in different writing modalities and to different recipients, rating textism use as inappropriate in formal exams and assignments, but appropriate in text messages, online chat and emails with friends and siblings. In a second study, we checked the examination papers of a separate sample of 153 Australian undergraduates for the presence of textisms. Only a negligible number were found. We conclude that, overall, university students recognise the different requirements of different recipients and modalities when considering textism use and that students are able to avoid textism use in exams despite media reports to the contrary.]]> Sat 24 Mar 2018 07:41:21 AEDT ]]>